X Feed Intel beta

individual tinkerer enterprises
Weekly Prep Posts Topics History
789 relevant 273 topics 2290 posts $1.633 cost fetched 02-23T23:00
789
Relevant
273
Topics
2290
Total Posts
$1.633
Cost This Week
$1.633
Total Cost
2026-02-23T23:00
Last Fetch
← Back to Topics
Agents & Autonomy

AI agent safety and autonomous system reliability failures

Discussion of autonomous AI agent reliability risks, failure modes, and safety concerns in production deployment including system-level damage and unintended destructive actions.

6 posts · First seen 2026-02-23 · Last activity 2026-02-23
TimeAuthorPost
2026-02-23T22:25 @AlexReibman If you haven't had at least one security freak out playing with agents, you're probably not experimenting enough
2026-02-23T21:47 @QuixiAI @HotAisle That sucks. Anyone could make a mistake like that. I've lost data and work to aggressive ai agents too. ↩ reply parent
2026-02-23T21:41 @max_paperclips why are you expecting the LLM to respect access control or rules with a prompt? You need RBAC for agents, sandboxing, permissioned tool use with deterministic rules etc etc https://t.co/lmkxgJH4Iz
2026-02-23T21:12 @agihouse_org RT @summeryue0: Nothing humbles you like telling your OpenClaw “confirm before acting” and watching it speedrun deleting your inbox. I coul…
2026-02-23T20:49 @tszzl the optimal number of times you let an agent delete your whole machine is nonzero https://t.co/GGyV6mng1W
2026-02-23T19:40 @milesaturpin The responses to this are so uninformed 😂 this is basically just dogfooding - safety work involves exploring new capabilities and failures, getting firsthand experience with how alignment can fail. This is ultimately still a completely reversible action, this wasn’t reckless. Here’s an example of a safety researcher bricking their entire computer with an agent. I wonder why the response here was so different 🙄 https://t.co/mznq41isKm
@AlexReibman 2026-02-23T22:25
If you haven't had at least one security freak out playing with agents, you're probably not experimenting enough
@QuixiAI 2026-02-23T21:47
@HotAisle That sucks. Anyone could make a mistake like that. I've lost data and work to aggressive ai agents too.
↩ reply parent
@max_paperclips 2026-02-23T21:41
why are you expecting the LLM to respect access control or rules with a prompt? You need RBAC for agents, sandboxing, permissioned tool use with deterministic rules etc etc https://t.co/lmkxgJH4Iz
@agihouse_org 2026-02-23T21:12
RT @summeryue0: Nothing humbles you like telling your OpenClaw “confirm before acting” and watching it speedrun deleting your inbox. I coul…
@tszzl 2026-02-23T20:49
the optimal number of times you let an agent delete your whole machine is nonzero https://t.co/GGyV6mng1W
@milesaturpin 2026-02-23T19:40
The responses to this are so uninformed 😂 this is basically just dogfooding - safety work involves exploring new capabilities and failures, getting firsthand experience with how alignment can fail. This is ultimately still a completely reversible action, this wasn’t reckless. Here’s an example of a safety researcher bricking their entire computer with an agent. I wonder why the response here was ...

Markdown Export

Loading...